Here's the fwd email I promised to publish in my blog today. It's kinda long so, take ur time reading okeh? Signing off for the weekend! Take care!

All praise is due to Allah and may His peace and blessing be on the Rasul.

When I watched the video clip of the beheading, I had a strong feeling that it does not look real.

This feeling is derived from my yearly experience of killing animal during Eid- kabir. Often several minutes after killing the ram, blood would be gushing out from the neck of the animal. In this case, when the guy raised the severed head, no blood was gushing out , it was dry.

Secondly, if you look closely on the floor, no apparent blood was flowing on it. This feeling was later confirmed by the mails I received from a yahoogroup that I have subscribed to.

My conclusion is that the American soldiers killed their fellow country man to wipe up hatred towards the Iraqi and to justify their continuos stay in the country.

To cover up this nefarious act , they have to come up with a phantom video clip. However, God is not always on the side of the wicked and oppressor, hence the glaring defects in the video clip.

We should not be surprised that they can go to the extent of killing their fellow country man, since the few Americans war monger and capitalists have used thousands of their soldiers to defend their agenda in Iraq. " So to the American, the end justify the means".

Fishy Circumstances and Flawed Timelines Surround American's Beheading 15 Reasons why the execution was not done by Iraqis:
1) Berg's last known whereabouts was in U.S. custody.
2) Berg shown in video wearing orange jumpsuit known to be of U.S. issue (compare with pictures at Guantanamo).
3) Extremely convenient "wag the dog" timing at the height of furor regarding U.S. torture of Iraqis
4) CNN poll question: "Is the Berg killing a reason for withholding any remaining Iraq prisoner abuse pictures?" Bush has been reported to be struggling with question of whether Pentagon should release additional torture photos. Given that the alleged decapitation of Berg was allegedly prompted by the first wave of torture photos, Bush could now cite "national security" issues for witholding additional materials.
5) Berg mysteriously captured by Al-Quaeda (still wearing jumpsuit). Either he escaped from U.S. captors or U.S. let him out -- with orange suit and all -- to be immediately apprehended by Al-Quaeda (before he had a chance to change).
6) Tape obviously spliced together and heavily edited. Goes from :-
a) Berg sitting in chair talking about family, to
b) Berg sitting on floor with hooded "militants" behind, to
c) blurry camera movement, to
d) almost motionless Berg on floor as head cut off.

7) Audio clearly dubbed in.

8) "Arab" reader flips through pages of "statement" and keeps ending up on the same page. Perhaps doesn't even known enough Arabic to recognize what page he's on?

9) "Arabs" have lily-white hands and (other exposed) skin.

10) "Arabs" have Western-style body posture and mannerisms.

11) When Berg decapitated, there was almost no blood. If Berg were still alive at this point, with the cut starting at front of throat, blood would have been spraying everywhere. Berg's severed head, the floor, Berg's clothes, and even the hand of the "Arab" who decapitated Berg had no visible blood on it.

12) Berg's body didn't move while on the ground. Although held down, Berg would have tried to instinctively wiggle and writhe away from captor's grip.

13) Camera angle made it impossible to see if Berg's eyes were even open.

14) Alleged "scream" from Berg sounded to be that of a woman and was clearly dubbed in.

15) Berg goes to great trouble to identify himself, providing information about his family. Why? To elicit greater sympathy? Or to provide a positive ID. FBI visited Berg family in an attempt to "verify his identity". Guy in video looks very little like Berg photos provided by family.

They said in the news that Nicholas berg was killed 2 weeks ago, however in the video the culprits who killed him said they were "avenging iraqi prisoner abuse" but those photos weren't released until last week, so my question is how is that even a possible motive if he was killed prior to the abuse photos being released?

The picture the media is now showing of the guy the terrorist beheaded as revenge for what went on in the Iraqi prisons looks odd to me. If you look at the men dressed in black, they all seem well fed. Actually most look fat. That bothers me, because these guys are fighting a war and eating on the run. They are constantly on the move and should be either very fit and trim or scrawny and malnourished because of the same reasons. One thing they should not be is fat like couch potatoes. If you look at all of the photos of the prisoners who were naked who supposedly were just plucked of the street, most of them are thin.

With several news outlets reporting that Berg's family is angry from the US government over their son's violent death and revelations that "Berg was detained by Iraqi police at a checkpoint in Mosul on March 24. He was turned over to U.S. officials and detained for 13 days" (in other words, he was detained by the US military just prior to his death

Jeff Rense has compiled some important information on Berg's detainment and questioning what really happened in his article, "Why Did The US Take Custody Of Nick Berg?"

Two things are for sure:

First, Berg parents feel that their son was abandoned and betrayed by the US Government.
Second: NeoCons have already started to use Nick Berg's murder to justify torture and more war!

Posted by Wan Mohd Fahimi @ 4:55 PM